« Skins Gallery | Main | Art Meets TV Land »

Monday, April 28, 2003

Round-Heeled Granny

Rod Dreher at The Corner posts about this unbelievable article:

New York Times: Sex and the Single Senior

It's about a 70-year-old woman who has decided that promiscuity is the path to happiness. She is even writing a book about her "adventures." Dreher pretty much said what I think of all this, but I'd like to comment on a couple of things:

Ms. Juska, a retired high school English teacher (round-heeled is an antiquated slang expression for a promiscuous woman), was moved to action after seeing Eric Rohmer's film "Autumn Tale." Its plot involves a woman placing a personal ad in a newspaper on her middle-age friend's behalf.

Okay, so this woman makes a life-altering decision based on...a movie. You've got to be kidding me!

"Before I got home I had written my ad in my head," Ms. Juska said. "But I did think, as if I were teaching a class and would ask my students, `What harm might this decision cause other people?' The only person that would be is my son. So I asked him, and he said: `Go get 'em, Mom. It's your turn.' The night I sent the ad in I felt so great."

My own mother is about the same age as this woman. I couldn't imagine saying to my mother, "Go ahead and sleep around, Mom! Have fun!" This is weird and messed up on so many levels.

"When women in particular hear about what I've done, the question which unbidden comes to them is, `What have I done with my life?' " she continued. "And lots of people at my age don't want to go back and look at it. That's why they're so nuts about their grandchildren. It keeps the focus off them."

So being promiscuous is "doing something with your life?" And maybe people your age are nuts about their grandchildren because they value family. I suppose this woman is too self-absorbed to see that keeping the focus off yourself and putting others first can be a good thing.

I don't know what annoys me more about this article, the woman it's about, or the breezy, look-at-this-plucky-old-lady-rising-above-repression tone. Ugh.

Comments

Mac Gravatar.com

This here old lady is God's gift to male Christians. The mere mental image of her dancing the funky chicken would be enough to make us all go celibate for the next 50 years.

Posted on May 1, 2003 at 10:47 PM

LOL! Good point! :-D

Posted on May 2, 2003 at 12:27 AM
Antoinette Gravatar.com

So many opinions for people who apparently haven't bothered to read the book (did you even read the article, Mac & Susan, or did you just read the Rod Dreher post ABOUT the article??...and this is enough for you to base your valuable opinion? Is it this easy?)! Dreher only commented on a brief article about the book, he did not even read the actual book being written about. The qoutes pulled from the book were used to make his point, and completely out of context.
Not only would I never use a single article as a base for my opinion about a book, I certainly would not base an opinion on an OPINION about an article about the book. Can you not see how absurd this is? Yet there is such a note of smugness is both of your replies, why?
Having just finished the book, I can say that I am immensely impressed with this - yes - respectable woman.
Having said that, I will continue on my way and go back to surfing the net to find more information about this remarkable woman and shake my head at sites such as this.
Antoinette

Posted on May 14, 2003 at 5:14 PM

Antoinette,

So many opinions for people who apparently haven't bothered to read the book (did you even read the article, Mac & Susan, or did you just read the Rod Dreher post ABOUT the article??

Um...yes I did read the article. In fact, my whole post was in response to the article. Dreher's post on the Corner merely made me aware of it. Why would you assume I didn't read the article?

...and this is enough for you to base your valuable opinion? Is it this easy?)!

Yep! Ain't blogs great? ;-)

Dreher only commented on a brief article about the book, he did not even read the actual book being written about. The qoutes pulled from the book were used to make his point, and completely out of context.

Actually, he pulled quotes from the article you assumed I didn't read. Do you really think that if only Dreher (and the rest of us) would read the book, we would be freed from our shackles of sexual repression and suddenly believe promiscuity is wonderful and liberating?

Not only would I never use a single article as a base for my opinion about a book, I certainly would not base an opinion on an OPINION about an article about the book. Can you not see how absurd this is?

Are you saying that fawning New York Times article somehow misrepresented this woman and her book? If the article did not misrepresent the subject at hand, then why is it absurd to form an opinion based on it? And I think that reading the book would be a waste of time for me. I'm simply not interested in reading about some old woman's sexcapades.

Yet there is such a note of smugness is both of your replies, why?

Smugness? Well, call me a big prudey square, but I think it's stupid for a woman of any age to hook up with a bunch of strange men for casual sex. I'm just old-fashioned that way. And I don't think Mac was being smug either. He was using humor to comment on an absurd situation.

Having just finished the book, I can say that I am immensely impressed with this - yes - respectable woman. Having said that, I will continue on my way and go back to surfing the net to find more information about this remarkable woman and shake my head at sites such as this.

Well, that's what free expression is all about. You can shake your head at me for my opinions and decide not to read my blog, and I can shake my head at Ms. Juska and decide not to read her book. It all works out beautifully, don't you think?

Posted on May 14, 2003 at 8:30 PM

Dropped in through one of the referrals to my site. To be honest, I didn't read the article or the book or whatever, just thought I'd make a light hearted joke in general. Lighten up already. :-P

Love your blog by the Susan. Keep up the good work!

Posted on May 15, 2003 at 3:50 PM

Thanks, Mac! :-)

Posted on May 15, 2003 at 8:37 PM

I just heard an interview on NPR with Jane Juska. From what she said in the interview, the way she went about her adventures was not in the least promiscuous. Though she did have sex with some of the men she met, the way she went about it hardly seemed sleazy. Some people sow their wild oats when they're young, some wait I guess! I plan to buy and read her book...it sounds fascinating to me!

Posted on May 22, 2003 at 11:06 AM



Copyright © 2002-2009 LilacRose.nu. All rights reserved.