Is the PBA ban ineffectual?
I'm not sure what to think of what this guy says. He believes the PBA ban was worded in such a way as to make it very easy to get around, so therefore it's useless. (If that's the case, why are the pro-abortion groups so upset?)
He also predicts that new ultrasound technologies will eventually be used for "non-invasive" abortions.
I'd like to know what some other folks think of this. Is the writer of this column just an alarmist, or does he have a point?
One thing razormouth doesn't mention though, is that the ultrasound abortion technique would be legal whether or not the PBA ban was in effect. The PBA ban may encourage more of that type of abortion, but it is in no way making a new type of abortion legal.