« Go ahead, call me a prude... | Main | Free Piglet! Down with Dhimmitude! »

Tuesday, October 4, 2005

A Miers Distraction

Everyone is in a tizzy over the nomination of Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court. The Anchoress thinks Bush is playing "rope-a-dope", whereas Mark Shea just thinks Bush is a dope.

My own opinion is similar to the Anchoress':

She may not make it to the Supreme Court. Bush may not even intend for her to get there. She may be, rather than the “misdirection,” many expected, an out-and-out decoy, floated to allow both the liberals and the conservatives to blast her out of the water so that Bush can then put up another candidate that both left and right - after having behaved very badly over Miers - will not dare to behave badly over, again.

That's pretty much how I see it. The left hates her, the right hates her...she will never be confirmed. Bush knows that and Miers knows that too. I also think her nomination (and rejection) will be a distraction that will make it easier for Bush to get the person he really wants confirmed once this brouhaha is over. That's my prediction anyway...

Update: Okay, would someone on the right explain something to me? Why are so many on the right having pants-wetting hissy fits over this woman's nomination? Is it snobbery (because she isn't "Ivy League")? Is it because you are an idiot who thinks that if an older woman isn't married that she must be gay or something? (And to think, it used to be that only unmarried men had the "honor" of being slandered that way. Score another one for feminism!) Really...what is your problem? This is a serious question.

I mean, I don't know much about this woman, so I don't understand the hysteria. She may be a terrible nominee, but I really don't know enough about her to judge that yet. I'm sure her fitness (or unfitness) will come to light during the confirmation hearings. The Anchoress takes the different factions on the right to task for their immaturity and tells them to grow up. She has more patience than I do...every other blog I read the past couple of days makes me want to yell, "Shut up! Shut up! SHUT UP!", and then slap them silly.

**sigh** I'm getting misanthropic again. I almost feel like I need to take another blogging break...

Trackback Pings

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Miers Distraction:

>>Harriet Miers - Susan B. Has Another Take from Thinklings
From Susan B. over at Lilac Rose: My own opinion is similar to the Anchoress’: She may not make it to the Supreme Court. Bush may not even intend for her to get there. She may be, rather than the “misdirection,” many expected, an out-and-o... [Read More]

Tracked on October 6, 2005 11:40 AM

>>Bush Defends Court Pick, Iraq Progress from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
In the face of criticism from the left and right, President Bush insisted Tuesday that Harriet Miers [Read More]

Tracked on October 7, 2005 4:01 PM

Comments

I stopped by to see if you were back from hiatus, and boy are you! Anyway, from what I've heard, the disappointment with this nomination is Yet Another Thing Bush Has Done to Disappoint Us. He's done nothing about illegal immigration, spending is through the roof, No Child Left Behind, McCain/Feingold, etc, and now when many expected to see someone like Janice Rogers Brown, he instead nominates an unknown with big question marks. With a Republican White House and Republican majority Congress, I think people really expected to see a lot more kicking bu** and taking names from Bush and Co. then we have been. Some think the nomination is a sign that Bush is too scared of the Dems to put up someone already known to be who will adhere strictly to the Constitution. Hope there is some sort of plan here, but I'm not so sure.

Posted on October 6, 2005 at 6:06 PM

Hi Barb,

Great to see you again! :-) I understand what you're saying. I also think Bush has been too lax on illegal immigration and I think McCain/Feingold is a violation of the First Amendment. Bush should just tell his critics to stuff it and do what he was elected by his base to do. I think being the object of irrational hatred has taken a toll on him and he is trying too hard to prove he's a nice guy and to make people like him. He needs to buck up and realize that these people are going to hate him and call him "Bushitler" no matter what he does.

As for this nominee, like I said, she may be dubious or she may be a solid choice. Apparently, she once gave money to and supported Democrats and that's what people are leery about. But people can change their opinions, either by honest conviction or by opportunism. If the former is true for her, then great. If the latter is true, then I can understand the objections. I'm just waiting to see what happens.

Posted on October 6, 2005 at 6:27 PM

I think the donation to the Democrats is trivial: in Texas, in 1988, that's where the power was, and if you wanted access to the portal, that's where you directed your contributions. (I think even Phil Gramm was still a Democrat back then, and nobody is accusing him of being David Souter in a dirndl.)

Posted on October 6, 2005 at 7:05 PM

Hi Charles,

That's true...I forgot about that. I keep forgetting that the South was pretty much a Democrat domain until the 1990's. Many people in the South are registered as Democrats but vote Republican. As the Democratic Party has gone further left over the years, they have lost a lot of the moderate and conservative Democrats in the South.

Posted on October 6, 2005 at 9:32 PM

I'm not so concerned about previous donations, especially that long ago. I'm more unhappy about "cronyism", and I would have liked to see a more "in your face" nomination. Republicans are currently in power, but it's hard to tell that sometimes. Think we could elect Wonko the Sane president?

Posted on October 6, 2005 at 9:35 PM

Barb,

Republicans are currently in power, but it's hard to tell that sometimes.

I guess that's why so many conservatives refer to the GOP as the Stupid Party. They get into power and then squander their opportunities. The Miers nomination could be cronyism. I hope it isn't and that Bush sincerely thinks she's up to the job. Either that or she's just a distraction so that he can buy time.

Posted on October 6, 2005 at 9:48 PM



Copyright © 2002-2009 LilacRose.nu. All rights reserved.